4 ms·
Golang has some magic too - for example magic with capital letters in exported symbols. But generally golang is easier to read than line like this: > static NA
by codedokode 11y ago
Golang has some magic too - for example magic with capital letters in exported symbols. But generally golang is easier to read than line like this:
> static NAME: &'static str = "du";
- pcwalton 11y agoBecause Rust has lifetimes and Go doesn't, so Go doesn't need syntax for them. If you want to argue that Rust should use a garbage collector like Golang does (which entails arguing that everybody who is using Rust is wrong for not wanting an always-on GC) I'm happy to have that argument, but say so explicitly.