3 ms·
I used to study traffic a lot, and it's definitely true that eating additional capacity leads to more gridlock assuming the same type of driver. However, consi
by ccvannorman 11y ago
I used to study traffic a lot, and it's definitely true that eating additional capacity leads to more gridlock assuming the same type of driver.
However, consider the freeway case as a starting point. Freeways lock up because of congestion resulting from too many people merging on, causing people to plan poorly/brake suddenly, which leads to a recursive accordion effect, which leads to 5-10 mph stop and go for hours.
However, the actual throughput of cars past any one point on the freeway is actually higher at around 40-50 mph (you should get 1.5 - 2x throughput that you get at 10mph), assuming everyone is organized enough[1].
Now imagine pace cars whose sole job it is is to buffer and reduce the negative impacts of poor human decision on the freeway, with a total car increase of only 1-5%.
[1] Sorry, I don't remember the source, but I swear I had one a few years ago when I was heavy into traffic.
- dwyerm 11y agoI haven't seen the specific study you mentioned, but it is referred to in the book, "Traffic: Why We Drive the Way We Do (and What It Says About Us)" by Tom Vanderbilt. If you are at all interested in traffic, this is a very good book to start with. Mind you, despite being very convincing, I'm not yet a late-merger. I do find myself trying to drive more smoothly, though.