4 ms·
Could be useful given the choice of MIT license rather than a GPL variant.
by jamescun 11y ago
Could be useful given the choice of MIT license rather than a GPL variant.
- mikerichards 11y agoI guess this would matter to busy-box/router type applications.
- davexunit 11y agoThey really should use the GPL and not a pushover license.
- quotemstr 11y agoWhat is it with rewrite-the-world-in-Rust people being stridently anti-copyleft?
- cyphar 11y agoI don't understand it either. It's as though they want to ignore the history of free software, which simply wouldn't have happened without copyleft.
- kps 11y agoTautologically, it wouldn't have happened as it did, but free software long predates the FSF.
- cyphar 11y agoSure, but the FSF and the GNU project were reactions to proprietary software becoming more common. Free software wasn't recognised as such until Stallman saw the issue and decided to act. Saying that "free software existed before the FSF" is ignoring the fact that free software would've died almost entirely without the FSF and GNU.
- ivl 11y agoIf they're not doing a 'clean room' rewrite, I'd agree. Otherwise? That's their choice, and it's one I'm glad to see. This could be quite useful for OSes that aren't GPL'd, like the BSDs, or Redox.