Maybe we ought to settle this argument by looking at a completely neutral source: https://www.google.com/trends/explore#q=islam%2C%20terror%2C%20christianity%2

Maybe we ought to settle this argument by looking at a completely neutral source: https://www.google.com/trends/explore#q=islam%2C%20terror%2C%20christianity%2C%20buddhism%2C%20hinduism https://www.google.com/trends/explore#q=islam%2C%20terror%2C... Draw your own conclusion. Plus I don't think you really want to make this association. Breivik was a (neo-)Nazi (e.g. [1]). If anything he supports the argument that ideology leads to terrorism (it is baffling to me that anyone would ever think it doesn't). I don't think anyone is making the argument that there is only a single violent ideology on this planet. But I find it weird that to make your point you'd draw attention to the association between terror and ideologies. Because then you'd very quickly arrive at the obvious question : per ideology, how much terror, and at what point do we take action ? Per ideology, how much terror is something the above graph can help with. [1] http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/anders-breivik-mein-kampf-only-reason-surviving-prison-adolf-hitler-nazi-a6934336.html http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/anders-breivi...