3 ms·
You must be confusing "natural rights" with the perverse definition we currently have of "rights", which are "positive" rather than "negative". Something as sim
by zo1 11y ago
You must be confusing "natural rights" with the perverse definition we currently have of "rights", which are "positive" rather than "negative". Something as simple as freedom from forced labour is still not fully adhered to even in the US.
Have a look at the Wikipedia page for some more info:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_law https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_law