3 ms·

Please no. I really love Safari for being just a really good browser. No 'sneaky OS' like Chrome (I don't need Chromes User management, thank you, and I'd much

Please no. I really love Safari for being just a really good browser. No 'sneaky OS' like Chrome (I don't need Chromes User management, thank you, and I'd much rather have my OS's context menus and font aliasing), and speedier, if you will, 'snappier' than Firefox, with its custom animations for every button and overall not very 'native' look and feel. No, I want a browser that does what a browser should do; let me easily and speedily browse the web. Safari is great at that.

possibleNoob 11y ago
>No, I want a browser that does what a browser should do; let me easily and speedily browse the web. Safari is great at that. Except it isn't. Because it's non standard different way of handling things means it's a lot more work for Web developers to give the same experience they give in chrome to safari users. You get a dumbed down experience on safari as a result.
- ihuman 11y ago
  Are you saying that Longhanks isn't browsing the web "easily and speedily"? Even though it doesn't follow some standards, it appears to be fast for Longhanks anyway.
spankalee 11y ago
What does that have to do with release schedules?
chris_wot 11y ago
Except when a large number of sites break due to someone committing unreviewed code that makes it into Safari releases: https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152803 https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152803
grumblestumble 11y ago
...at the expense of slowing down the adoption of agreed-upon standards to the point that they can't be reliably utilized because of compatibility issues? This is not exactly a new scenario. At least Microsoft has moved on.