4 ms·
This looks interesting but the screencast video kind of failed to make the point in my opinion. Take a look at serverless talks or apex intro https://medium.com
by alpb 11y ago
This looks interesting but the screencast video kind of failed to make the point in my opinion. Take a look at serverless talks or apex intro https://medium.com/@tjholowaychuk/introducing-apex-800824ffaa70 https://medium.com/@tjholowaychuk/introducing-apex-800824ffa... for how to prepare a better illustration that proves your point.
> Isolation is not a real issues today, containers can provide complete isolation between runtimes and much more.
Most people will not necessarily agree. Containers don’t provide complete isolation and from a theoretical standpoint they never will (unless we rewrite the Linux kernel). There have been security vulnerabilities in the past about this and there will be, it’s just the way it is. Your argument here should probably be ”it's safe for single tenant use“ i.e. all the code runs on effe is your company's code.
Also coming back to the video again, I just can't fully understand what this project does, it just looks like a Go web server framework.
- _jezell_ 11y agoYou could use the same logic to say virtualization isn't safe, but it doesn't stop cloud providers from putting multiple people's VMs on the same instance. Regardless of the technologies you use in your datacenter, there will be vulnerabilities that will need to be found, patched, and fixed.
- siscia 11y agoThe point is to have a single binary for every single endpoint you need. Now you can deploy those binaries in whatever platform makes sense for you and scale those endpoint independently. All being open source.