> I don't think there's a need to publish those addresses. There are already lists with those IPs available... Interestingly, the IP address of that router is

> I don't think there's a need to publish those addresses. There are already lists with those IPs available... Interestingly, the IP address of that router is _not_ present in either the base (attacks within the past 360 days) list or the delisted (manually removed from the base list by the person in question) list. It's almost like no single list is terribly likely to be complete, and that publishing collation of a master list is required for completeness. :)