> Yep that says it all. Hardly the example of what innovation means. It appears you fundamentally misunderstood my point. Though innovation has occurred on my

> Yep that says it all. Hardly the example of what innovation means. It appears you fundamentally misunderstood my point. Though innovation has occurred on my Linux system (and on my MS system) without fail for years, I haven't hard to learn bizarre new mouse movements and locations of menu items. Rather than slow me down, I can begin taking ADVANTAGE of innovations right away because they aren't implemented on CLI interfaces in a detestably-arbitrary manner. Also, I don't get your first point. If people got unhealthy and unemployable due to something OTHER than the mouse and GUI usage, then so what? That doesn't negate my point at all. It simply shows that yes, more than one cause exists for obesity and brain rot. It's been shown through years and years of clinical study that the injuries received at the modern office have to do with the movements associated with mouse usage. Keyboard use is easy to adapt safely to the modern healthy workplace (standing desks, padded surfaces for wrists and feet, etc.) Mouse use, on the other hand, barely works correctly for the seated and unhealthy worker, and works even less properly for the worker trying to make healthy changes. Mouse use is a problem. Keyboard use is not.