3 ms·
Would prefer it if it used OSM anyway, which I can also run my own version of if I am little twisted. Basically, with a bit of work, you could produce a comple
by PaulRobinson 11y ago
Would prefer it if it used OSM anyway, which I can also run my own version of if I am little twisted.
Basically, with a bit of work, you could produce a completely-self-hosted solution where there are no calls going out anywhere to anything you don't host yourself.
That's progress to my mind. Just needs a little more work to get there. If I didn't have family over this weekend...
- dvfjsdhgfv 11y agoThank you for thinking about this. I'm starting to think that self-hosted is the open source of today - the web is increasingly *aaS-centric, and users don't even have the idea it's not the only way.
- maxerickson 11y agoA medium term solution is to use one of the apps that provide OSM data offline. For a medium sized region, the download might only be 100 MB. Unless you are in Germany (or some other region where OSM data is particularly dense).