4 ms·
He's mad about "Philip was ordered to pay child support to Michelle in the amount of $865 per week, retroactive to July, 2013, less certain credits." From the
by GFK_of_xmaspast 11y ago
He's mad about "Philip was ordered to pay child support to Michelle in the amount of $865 per week, retroactive to July, 2013, less certain credits."
From the footnotes:
2. Philip mischaracterizes the weekly child support order by including, as part of his weekly obligation, the lump sum of retroactive support he was ordered to pay.
3. The judge found that the value of Michelle's assets was in excess of $720,000, and that the value of Phillip's assets was nearly $16,000,000.
4. The judge found Michelle's weekly income, exclusive of child support, to be $3,914.25, and Phillip's weekly income, exclusive of the child support obligation, to be $6,846.64.
So in other words Phillip Greenspun brings in over $350k/year and is getting all fired up about having to pay at most $45k-ish to support a child that he helped bring into this world.
- harryh 11y agoThx for digging through the footnotes. Indeed, his apparent rage at the issue seems completely out of proportion to the size of the checks he's writing.