3 ms·
It's simple ignorance. People think .NET = old, not innovative, corporate In reality its a fast moving stack, that's constantly innovating.
by UK-AL 11y ago
It's simple ignorance. People think .NET = old, not innovative, corporate
In reality its a fast moving stack, that's constantly innovating.
- vetinari 11y agoIt's not a simple ignorance. The wast majority of people, who claim .NET experience can launch Visual Studio, then some wizards to generate skeleton of the app and then fill something to have a CRUD "solution". They spoil it for the folks, who are truly experienced. The claims in the CVs are so maximized (Dunning-Kruger at the extreme), that it's simpler to just ignore .NET experience.
- UK-AL 11y ago"The wast majority of people, who claim .NET experience can launch Visual Studio, then some wizards to generate skeleton of the app" - This is the ignorance. There are people who are pretty bad on other stacks as well. I know many competent .NET developers. And many terrible PHP developers. On average the average .NET developer is more skilled then your average Python developer. This has about as much substance as your claim.
- bitwize 11y agoHow many Ruby on Rails Rockstars and Node.js Ninjas really, truly know computer science? My guess is "way fewer than is touted".