3 ms·
That's not true - there's heurystic analysis techniques, generic signature detection etc. Of course they may not meet your definition of "reliably"
by V-2 11y ago
That's not true - there's heurystic analysis techniques, generic signature detection etc. Of course they may not meet your definition of "reliably"
- aleeds 11y agoI think that when it comes to this, each individual gets to define what reliably is, and nothing else matters.
- ryao 11y ago> That's not true - there's heurystic analysis techniques, generic signature detection etc. Of course they may not meet your definition of "reliably" The only reliable things in security are the things that an attacker cannot bypass even when knowing that they in use (e.g. RSA). The premise of the article being discussed is that heuristics are trivial to bypass.