> It's only one of three different sources of the same information. Which is only part of the weight of evidence towards AGW. Not so fast. CRU didn't do measu

> It's only one of three different sources of the same information. Which is only part of the weight of evidence towards AGW. Not so fast. CRU didn't do measurements - it did adjustments and analysis. Christy now claims that all of the temperature stations are pretty much useless for determining changes over a few years, let alone multiple decades. If there's no observed temperature change, Christy's current position, then the other observed changes can not be due to temperature change.