4 ms·
To support this hypothesis, you'd have to show that some other process did make (for example) the perfect editor. Otherwise, this is not a weakness of open sour
by pekk 11y ago
To support this hypothesis, you'd have to show that some other process did make (for example) the perfect editor.
Otherwise, this is not a weakness of open source.
- CJefferson 11y agoI wouldn't say they make the perfect editor, but they do make changes. For example, I like the fact that almost every editor on my mac obeys the standard shortcut keys (at the minimum, apple+x,c,v for cut/copy/paste, apple+z undo, apple+s save, apple+q quit, apple+f find, apple+g find next, apple+a select all). If you started vim or emacs today, would you choose on a mac to not follow the standard interface rules, when the editor was first started? I would (personally) hope not.
- nibnib 11y agodoes the terminal emulator on your mac use the emacs shortcuts?
- CJefferson 11y agoNo, it uses the keys I listed, like everything else on the mac (I feel like you are aiming at something here, or are you just curious about mac terminals?) * Well, not all of them, save doesn't really make sense for a terminal, and 'cut' can't really be implemented for a general terminal app. but copy/paste/find/find next/close window/select all and others are all fine).
- nibnib 11y agoThe default movement keys are (I believe) inherited from emacs.