3 ms·
They're not even debating, they're just stating the major arguments. It could just as easily be an article stating the facts of the case, and might well be more
by FungalRaincloud 11y ago
They're not even debating, they're just stating the major arguments. It could just as easily be an article stating the facts of the case, and might well be more valuable if it was.
- natch 11y agoSome of the arguments. If this is experimental journalism where they say "hey we recorded this conversation over coffee, wouldn't it be fun to share it on the site and see what happens?" then that's kind of cool, but if they consider it a full debate of the issues or even only the issues before the court, it's pretty weak.