4 ms·
OpenStreetMaps seems to show the building in the new position. https://www.openstreetmap.org/search?query=oerlichon#map=17/47.41031/8.54073 https://www.openstr
by cromulent 11y ago
OpenStreetMaps seems to show the building in the new position.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/search?query=oerlichon#map=17/47.41031/8.54073 https://www.openstreetmap.org/search?query=oerlichon#map=17/...
- mtmail 11y agoHere's the change, about 1 week after the article was published. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/11751043 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/11751043 The commit doesn't have a comment, but a new field 'note: position after movement estimated' was added by the committer. A year later another mapper added building color and material, last year a mapper added the full address and today somebody added the building name "Oerlikon" because that's what people usually refer to (Openstreetmap's search updates almost minutely).
- maxerickson 11y agoThere's no technical enforcement of the persistence though. It could be the same objects with different coordinates, completely new objects or objects that used to be a lake and are now a building. So you can say that OpenStreetMap doesn't formally model the move, but it might be reflected in the changes to the objects that make up the building. I wouldn't be surprised if other systems are similar in not actually modeling moves specifically but having some evidence for a move in the data (maybe just a human readable note of the move).