4 ms·
If you are reading RFC2616 closely enough then you'll see that you don't really need to implement anything more complicated than what is in 1.0. E.g it technica
by poizan42 11y ago
If you are reading RFC2616 closely enough then you'll see that you don't really need to implement anything more complicated than what is in 1.0. E.g it technically requires you to support Keep-Alive, but it also states that the server is allowed to close the connection anytime it wants.
- nickpsecurity 11y agoWhat counts as a web server is quite a bit more complex, esp implementation. Even lighthttpd is non-trivial. The standards are for the tiniest core of the problem while leaving off significant issues. That might be acceptable in a web interface to trusted computer as Im advocating. It's barely a web server, though.