3 ms·
Capitalism. Sure, you can go it alone, but if you're making good profits in your niche you better expect a well-capitalized competitor to come sniffing around.
by tryitnow 11y ago
Capitalism. Sure, you can go it alone, but if you're making good profits in your niche you better expect a well-capitalized competitor to come sniffing around.
And when they find out you're minting money they'll jump in and undercut you on price, poach your talent, replicate your product (but not all the costs you put into development), and then do everything to out-compete you. And then your profits start to corrode. And eventually you're either forced to sale or forced into ever more narrow niches.
Public companies have a cheaper cost of capital, which means they can, over time, outcompete non-public companies.
There's a few exceptions to this like private-equity backed companies, and large closely-held private super firms like Koch, Cargill, etc. But if anything these firms are even more ruthlessly capitalistic than public companies.
There's no way around this unless you occupy a very well-protected space that big companies wouldn't find profitable.
I think it's becoming increasingly more difficult to find such spaces in software.
- derefr 11y agoIn other words: if there's a healthy market with three equal players (A, B, C) and you, as A, don't merge with either B or C... then B and C are going to merge, and the newly-formed B+C is going to use its increased efficiency to outcompete you. At the highest levels, this is considered monopolism, and measures are put in place to avoid it... but at its lower levels, this is just "everything working as expected" in the engine of capitalism.