> If the system properly redistributed the profits from moving the factory abroad to, say, education and retraining and job placement programs to the American w

> If the system properly redistributed the profits from moving the factory abroad to, say, education and retraining and job placement programs to the American workers, then we wouldn't be having this debate in the first place. Yes we would, but it'd be the employers complaining about the unjustified entitlement of the American workers who think the company owes them profits and retraining. Why should a factory in Mexico pay out profits to unemployed Americans to deal with their employment issues? By what justification does a company "owe" the workers anything beyond wages for labor?