2 ms·
But economists aren't scientists. Most are employed to support government ideologies. And these IGM economists are handpicked by some committee. For example, t
by calibraxis 11y ago
But economists aren't scientists. Most are employed to support government ideologies. And these IGM economists are handpicked by some committee.
For example, they're supposedly "geographically diverse". That means: Berkeley, Chicago, Harvard, MIT, Princeton, Stanford, Yale.
Where's Dean Baker, one of the few who predicted the housing bubble crash & impact of 2007-2008? Stiglitz? Pettifor? Varoufakis? Piketty? Do they not have sufficiently "impeccable qualifications" even by bureaucratic credentialist standards?
Pseudoscience and lying with statistics is the Economist Way. Consensus by a bunch of handpicked suit-wearing economists is nothing like the scientific consensus on global warming. "Globalization" and "free trade" are doublespeak; you have to prefix them with "corporate", like corporate globalization.
- baddox 11y agoI don't understand your argument. This is an instance of the vast majority of scientists disagreeing with the policies of the vast majority of national governments.