>Do you think a publication should be able to publish facts about a person? Yes. >Do you think a publication should be able to publish facts about a person wi

>Do you think a publication should be able to publish facts about a person? Yes. >Do you think a publication should be able to publish facts about a person without their consent? Depends. Is it important that other people know these facts, as in "will they be harmed/make bad decisions if they don't know them"? (Think knowledge about a politician.) >Do you think a publication should be able to publish facts about a person that were initially obtained illegally but were given to the publication? (see wikileaks…etc) See question two.