4 ms·
> I'm a developer in Windows and contribute to the NT kernel. (Proof: the SHA1 hash of revision #102 of [Edit: filename redacted] is [Edit: hash redacted].) I'm
by i336_ 11y ago
> I'm a developer in Windows and contribute to the NT kernel. (Proof: the SHA1 hash of revision #102 of [Edit: filename redacted] is [Edit: hash redacted].) I'm posting through Tor for obvious reasons.
My Google-fu isn't turning up any non-redacted versions of this line; all I see are the countless copies of this redacted version made over the last 3 years.
It would be nice to be able to note the file and hash references in question in the case the opportunity ever arises to verify this. That would be pretty cool :)
IMO releasing one filename is not really a security issue, and a hash is categorically useless garbage.
- to3m 11y agohttps://archive.is/BaZlv https://archive.is/BaZlv - "the SHA-1 hash of revision #102 of pagfault.c is 0cb82a9525a2158e2a87f5eb53d41e5936cee5a2" (this link came from the Reddit thread in which this article was discussed the other day - https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/4amfp2/i_contribute_to_the_windows_kernel_we_are_slower/ https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/4amfp2/i_contr...)
- jrockway 11y agoNice. Saying "XXX [redacted]" is an even better way to draw attention to something than just writing it out.