4 ms·
The animations are so smooth. Unfortunately not in Firefox, at least for me (FF3.6 / Win7). Especially this test was horrible: http://razorjack.net/quicksand
by bd 17y ago
The animations are so smooth.
Unfortunately not in Firefox, at least for me (FF3.6 / Win7).
Especially this test was horrible:
http://razorjack.net/quicksand/demos/one-set-clone.html http://razorjack.net/quicksand/demos/one-set-clone.html
Chrome, Safari and Opera performed much better. Even Explorer had smooth animation, though alpha-channel transparency animation there is broken.
- boundlessdreamz 17y agooh. On chrome mac it is very smooth. On Firefox 3.6 Mac, sometimes the "rearranging objects" feels non-smooth.
- bd 17y agoRearranging is quite fine, it's crossfade and zoom that is very jerky on my notebook. I suspect it could be something about transparencies. Firefox has long tradition of slowdowns when dealing with alpha-channel transparency, especially when compositing multiple transparent layers (also this demo uses "text-shadow" CSS property which puts additional load on renderer).
- psadauskas 17y agoIts smooth for me, FF3.5/Win7. I can't tell any difference between it and Chrome
- bd 17y agoI just tested FF3.5.7 and it's noticeably smoother than FF3.6.
- GrandMasterBirt 17y agoWow, would have never thought! Take that optimization!
- GrandMasterBirt 17y agoSlow for me: FF 3.6 / Ubuntu