But this is still a pretty trifling connection. People voted for segregation so that 52 years into the future, lower income upper class people could live in che

But this is still a pretty trifling connection. People voted for segregation so that 52 years into the future, lower income upper class people could live in cheap mixed race neighborhoods? That's really also not something that was very predictable. None of that is true of well-off white people taking advantage of a market inefficiency caused by decades of segregation....and an incentive along the same vector Segregation was a "you must discriminate" law to prevent greedy folks like the author of this article from exploiting the market inefficiencies. It seems like I've got 3 choices here. (+1) Violate the spirit of that law, reduce the market inefficiency, and make money. 0) Live in Asia. (-1) Make the inefficiency worse by moving into a nice white suburb, pay more money, and obey the spirit of that now absent law. To me it seems like "guilt follows benefit" implies I need to do (-1).