> I asked you not to tell random people that they're autistic because it's bad form False, you said I diagnosed them, I didn't, he diagnosed himself and I simp

> I asked you not to tell random people that they're autistic because it's bad form False, you said I diagnosed them, I didn't, he diagnosed himself and I simply agreed he was probably right. > No personal attack on you has been made. False again, and I quote "But it goes triple for you, given your rudimentary understanding of aspergers, intellect, or how people learn to recognize emotions." As you don't know me, that's absolutey a personal attack based on nothing. > You retaliated by contradicting yourself False, I contradicted nothing; I didn't diagnose anyone with anything and your repeating the lie doesn't make it true. > and sending two ad hominem attacks at me False, perhaps you need to look up ad hominem as well; insulting someone is not an ad hominem, it's only ad hominem if I claim your argument is wrong because of the insult. > No attempt to disprove my claim of your lack of knowledge Burden of proof. It's not my job to disprove your claims. > Yeah, I rest my case. You enjoy your day. I hope you're not a lawyer, because if that's your idea of a laying out a case, you'd be terrible at it.