5 ms·
Mr 'Don't Do Evil' has patented deep Q learning,it is getting a patent on brain
- ConfuciusSay02 11y agoThe patent system is patently broken.
- lotsoflumens 11y agoYet another attempt to own everything. They even reference Martin Riedmiller's work from 2005 on "Neural Fitted Q Iteration" and dismiss it, saying that his paper was just an "attempt" to use an MLP for the Q function, and that because his paper talks about rebuilding a new network with each new batch of data, resulting in an inefficient learning process - ergo, their method is novel. What utter nonsense. This completely misrepresents Riedmiller's work. They are really splitting some fine hairs here. Also, they admit that Martin Riedmiller wrote about the idea, even though he didn't use it in that paper. And yet, they still hope to control the technology.
- krapp 11y ago>Mr 'Don't Do Evil' has patented deep Q learning,it is getting a patent on brain Don't editorialize submission titles like this, please. The actual title is (and should be posted as) "Methods and apparatus for reinforcement learning."
- mchahn 11y agoI am tired of FUD stories about how broad a patent is. Patent claims are organized as a series of claims with each claim narrower than the one before. Patents are always written with the first claims extremely broad and are not expected to be granted. It isn't until near the end of the claims that the meat of the patent exists. In this case it has something to do with using multiple neural networks to train each other. I've read that is what they did with alphaGO.
- lotsoflumens 11y agoIt's only FUD until you have to find a few million to cover legal costs.
- GalwayResi 11y agohttp://info.legalzoom.com/challenge-patent-21969.html http://info.legalzoom.com/challenge-patent-21969.html
- GalwayResi 11y agohttp://info.legalzoom.com/challenge-patent-21969.html http://info.legalzoom.com/challenge-patent-21969.html