3 ms·
If I correctly guessed what you are talking about (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Department_for_Media_Harmful_to_Young_Persons#The_indexing_process http
by chronial 11y ago
If I correctly guessed what you are talking about (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Department_for_Media_Harmful_to_Young_Persons#The_indexing_process https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Department_for_Media_H...) then yes, it's about advertising. That law is about protecting minors from getting in contact with material that is deemed highly dangerous for them (e.g. the game "Manhunt" is on that list). Just telling them in the search results might be enough for them to seek out this game and eventually get it.
Edit: The law actually clearly states that a shop must not have the game on display anywhere a minor could see it
You are by the way the way totally allowed to sell these games. Without any advertising that is. In a classic shop that meant you keep it under the counter and if someone over 18 asks for it by name, you sell it. No idea how that would translate to an online shop.
But long story short: It seems very hard to interpret returning 451 to a url the user already has to know in advance as advertising.
I am pretty sure that if a minor asks for that game in a store you are also allowed to say "no, you are too young for this" and are not required to lie "what, no, never heard of that" ^^.
- wtbob 11y ago> In a classic shop that meant you keep it under the counter and if someone over 18 asks for it by name, you sell it. No idea how that would translate to an online shop. Wouldn't allowing users to search for the game by name be equivalent?
- chronial 11y agoI think the search is more like the shelve.
- kuschku 11y ago> No idea how that would translate to an online shop. That would translate to using the age verification of the eID ;)