You're right. To give them their due, 9to5mac do clearly credit the source, but they add little analysis, and the page is, frankly, terrible. I actually regret

You're right. To give them their due, 9to5mac do clearly credit the source, but they add little analysis, and the page is, frankly, terrible. I actually regret submitting this now (the original stackoverflow source is far superior) but this is how I was alerted to the data, via my RSS feed. Sorry.