4 ms·
I don't think any compiled or assembled language can be called "low level". If you really want to go low level, learn Machine code and CPU architecture. ... I
by dkopi 11y ago
I don't think any compiled or assembled language can be called "low level". If you really want to go low level, learn Machine code and CPU architecture.
...
I don't think any executed language can be called low level. If you really want to go low level, learn hardware design, VHDL/VERLIOG
...
I don't think any hardware description language can be called low level. If you really want to go low level, build your own logic gates out of transistors
...
- lmm 11y agoGo is not appreciably more low level than e.g. Haskell though. It leaves out high level constructs but it doesn't offer you any more control to make up for it.
- andrewvijay 11y agoHa ha.
- vvanders 11y agoHaving done all 3 of those, anything that involves manual memory management counts as low level in my book.
- daodedickinson 11y agoI'm with Nietzsche, the real low-level programming involves feeling new feelings and somehow communicating/philosophizing/programming them into other people.