"Child pornography". Any pornographic depiction of a person deemed 17 years old is child pornography. It needs not be a photo, it could be a drawing. If the ori

"Child pornography". Any pornographic depiction of a person deemed 17 years old is child pornography. It needs not be a photo, it could be a drawing. If the origin of the picture is unknown, I assume any picture of a young-looking 25 years old person could be assumed child pornography during an investigation. As horrible as actual unconsented pornography is, which I frankly condemn, I still take it with a grain of salt when I'm told "This CEO has child pornography on his computer".