22 ms·
Don't want to be an asshole but it really can't be called Deep Learning if it doesn't do backprob. Deep inference, at best. The paper reads like a bad joke.
by make3 11y ago
Don't want to be an asshole but it really can't be called Deep Learning if it doesn't do backprob. Deep inference, at best.
The paper reads like a bad joke.
- quonn 11y agoThat's because it apparently is actually a joke. "Website under construction! Official Release Date: April 1st 2016."
- yeukhon 11y agoNot even April Fool yet and people begin to leak stuff ahead of time. sigh
- clickok 11y agoI think that the authors of such excellent publications such as "Visually Identifying Rank", "A Spectral Method for Ghost Detection" and "N-dimensional Polytope Schemes"[1] deserve a little more credit than that. --- 1. http://www.oneweirdkerneltrick.com/ http://www.oneweirdkerneltrick.com/
- NamTaf 11y agoOf course it's a joke. This is the programming equivalent of some of the research that wins Ig Nobels.
- yitchelle 11y agoPlease turn your satire radar on.
- dimatura 11y agoBackprop may be added in the future. Meanwhile you can just adjust the weights directly! (They're in the "layer*" sheets).
- nosovicki 11y agoBack propagation just slows things down.