Makes sense. So, hypothetically, if crypto was used within US borders (e.g. I encrypt my hard drive) and no algorithms were shared across national borders, the

Makes sense. So, hypothetically, if crypto was used within US borders (e.g. I encrypt my hard drive) and no algorithms were shared across national borders, then one could attempt a Second Amendment defense (assuming it was still labeled as munitions)? I can see how recognizing it as speech and protecting it under the First Amendment would be superior. Thanks!