3 ms·
the tooling is way superior to common LISP, since it can leverage the huge Java ecosystem. Clojure tooling - it's basically a jar, so if you know how to use Jav
by bachback 11y ago
the tooling is way superior to common LISP, since it can leverage the huge Java ecosystem. Clojure tooling - it's basically a jar, so if you know how to use Java, you can always fall back to that. ayes, if you want a fully integrated stack with Clojurescript it takes considerable time. I spent that time and it beats everything I know hands down. if you want to code like everyone else, use something else. if you want to 10-100x productivity gains long-term then spend the time. http://paulgraham.com/avg.html http://paulgraham.com/avg.html
- Guthur 11y agoCheckout this series and quicklisp and then with a straight face say tgat clojure experience is better http://malisper.me/2015/07/07/debugging-lisp-part-1-recompilation/ http://malisper.me/2015/07/07/debugging-lisp-part-1-recompil... I have used both professionally and find the dev tooling for clojure very immature. Debugging tools is not a modern feature yet clojure jas very little
- base698 11y agohttp://endlessparentheses.com/cider-debug-a-visual-interactive-debugger-for-clojure.html http://endlessparentheses.com/cider-debug-a-visual-interacti... The cider debugger is one of the best I've seen. I've been able to stop, inject code and create a test case for failing tests. Cursive has similar functionality as well if you are afraid of emacs becoming a lifestyle :)