3 ms·
They don't have to be more competent if they are cheaper. Assuming that companies always hire the "best" for the job is naive.
by hvs 11y ago
They don't have to be more competent if they are cheaper. Assuming that companies always hire the "best" for the job is naive.
- saint_fiasco 11y agoThat they don't hire the best individual doesn't mean they don't hire the best team. Sometimes the cheap inexperienced developer is the best investment and you are not. In that situation the cheap inexperienced guy deserves the job and you don't. If the company makes a mistake, that is, they think they need a cheap inexperienced guy when in fact they need a 100% American-born-and-raised engineer, that company will be outcompeted by the ones who better know what they need.
- deleted 11y ago[deleted]
- hvs 11y agoYes, if people were reducible to a specific set of data points and the world worked on perfect knowledge and optimally efficiently, that would be true.