14 ms·
Previous SoSs didn't make extensive use of it, or like Rice, got exceptions. If the security apparatus doesn't allow people to get their job done, people will
by rrmm 11y ago
Previous SoSs didn't make extensive use of it, or like Rice, got exceptions.
If the security apparatus doesn't allow people to get their job done, people will find ways to solve their own problems.
For example, you could certainly ban all internet use. It would render moot a huge amount of security problems, but people wouldn't abide it. So you have to find the trade off that the user and the security people find acceptable.
- rrmm 11y agoI would like to point out that it doesn't excuse her action: You have to abide by the rules even when they are dumb. But it's a tension between rules and human nature that comes up often. It's like telling teenagers the only safe sex is no sex, and then not teaching them anything else about sex, because they shouldn't be having sex. You're going to have a bad time trying to make that work.