3 ms·
why would this in anyway end the scandal? so because the NSA didn't give in to your request you can go break security protocol and put people's lives at risk?
by moistgorilla 11y ago
why would this in anyway end the scandal? so because the NSA didn't give in to your request you can go break security protocol and put people's lives at risk?
- MisterBastahrd 11y agoIf anyone put anyone's lives at risk, it was the NSA for refusing to do their jobs. There's no "scandal" here.
- thrill 11y agoThe NSA did do its job - it performed a cost/benefit analysis and said _NO_.
- joesmo 11y agoSaying NO is exactly not doing their job when there are numerous alternatives to their provided computer. The secretary of state must be able to communicate with others, period. Since they couldn't figure out a proper solution (and from the article it sounds like they didn't even try/ignored her/insulted her) they left the secretary of state without a means to communicate. I'd say that's criminal, negligent, and certainly not doing their jobs.
- atf104 11y agoTrump still poses a larger threat to the country (and the world) by measure. https://gfs.eiu.com/Article.aspx?articleType=gr&articleId=2866 https://gfs.eiu.com/Article.aspx?articleType=gr&articleId=28...