> As he says, robots are the best workers. That's not a statement that can be made universally, I think. They're way better in scenarios which tend to be deter

> As he says, robots are the best workers. That's not a statement that can be made universally, I think. They're way better in scenarios which tend to be deterministic, but otherwise not so much (e.g. when there's more interaction with humans!). I also like the predictability of robots, but more than once I got blocked by a e-toll system with Gandalf-syndrome - "you shall not pass!" :). It's really a lousy, lousy experience. You can say "it was a case of bad implementation", but surely an analagous argument can be made to a less-than-performant human employee.