4 ms·
I totally agree. One of the reasons I like HN: high signal to noise ratio.
by mclovinit 11y ago
I totally agree. One of the reasons I like HN: high signal to noise ratio.
- mserdarsanli 11y agoHN is also mostly crap
- hodwik 11y agoWhen you're first getting started in tech I think HN seems much more serious than it is. Once you're a bit more experienced you realize it's a bunch of hipsters talking about simple and insignificant technologies, and completely ignoring everything else as "old". That being said, I think it's highly entertaining.
- lolidaisuki 11y ago> hipsters talking about simple and insignificant technologies Are you telling me that a new CSS framework that will save you two lines in your CSS files is insignificant? Or a new <insert the current language that is hip>-style language in <insert a number between 1 and 100> lines of JS! Surely these are the greatest inventions of our time.
- hodwik 11y agoRight. Meanwhile forward-looking tech like gaze detection, word vectors, LPWAN, FPGAs, and so on, are lucky to get a couple posts a month.
- dang 11y agoWhy don't you post some?
- mclovinit 11y agoI have been active in high tech for many moons and like to look at this place as just another alternative feed for a old man ;) I would much rather HN than other sources, but my time is limited like many. So I just hop on occassionally and learn (or teach) something new. Once in a while a post resonates with me, but when it doesn't that doesn't mean it's just noise. It can mean I have much to learn.
- lolidaisuki 11y ago> HN: high signal to noise ratio The signal on HN has started to decline tho. Things used to be better. It's kind of inevitable for online communities tho.
- mclovinit 11y agoI haven't been on for that long, but I am starting to see examples of what you mean. I tend to weed out what doesn't apply to me which I think many do.