4 ms·
Actually I don't think so. The main thing the owners of big networks are afraid of is spam. We provide a ridiculously expensive way to connect, say, Slack to S
by rekoros 11y ago
Actually I don't think so. The main thing the owners of big networks are afraid of is spam.
We provide a ridiculously expensive way to connect, say, Slack to Skype, which is ==great for Skype==, from almost every possible angle. It means Skype users can stay on Skype instead of switching to someone else's Slack team.
- taurath 11y agoIn that case great for skype, bad for slack. Someone, somewhere will decide they'd rather force those customers to use their service/client, or else they'd have an open protocol in the first place.
- rekoros 11y agoThere's a huge compliance problem with working in someone else's Slack team -- you own none of the resulting data and you don't control access on your end. Email is much better in this way, since everyone gets a copy. With Sameroom you essentially retain the carbon copy semantics of email, but with real-time collaboration. So, I'd argue that it's great for Slack.