> One element of the article that seemed particularly off was that he claims he still doesn't know why he was fired. He very likely knows, as he was in some wa

> One element of the article that seemed particularly off was that he claims he still doesn't know why he was fired. He very likely knows, as he was in some way involved in this drama: http://readwrite.com/2014/03/15/github-julia-ann-horvath-harassment-developer/ http://readwrite.com/2014/03/15/github-julia-ann-horvath-har... What his actual role was, however, is likely unprovable or not worth trying to prove. As informative as his blog post otherwise is, going into the "reasons" would likely re-open a can of worms everyone is happy to have closed. Edit: I'm not saying he did anything untoward. I just find it highly unlikely that it's a coincidence that he's one of the names named by Julie after her departure and shortly afterwards he's fired under "mysterious circumstances" despite being one of the most productive and senior developers in the company. He just got caught up in that drama somehow, and as he says himself in the blog post "HR is not your friend".