4 ms·

My experience with Purescript/pulp was rather negative. Basic commands were throwing errors (pulp init IIRC) so I decided to not even consider it for anything s

• pka 11y ago
  The tooling is not perfect, that's absolutely true. I have to say though that any imperfections (which are going to get fixed anyway) are well worth it if you want a pure strongly typed language for the web. There's simply nothing better (except the full-blown Haskell-to-js compilers, like GHCJS and Haste of course). I recommend you try again and file a bug or look for help in irc if something breaks again (although I've never seen pulp init throw an error).
  • skeeterbug 11y ago
    My memory could be off (on which command failed). I think I still have the repo on my home machine, so I could re-visit and file a bug report. At the time I kept pursuing elm instead. Reports of better FFI with JS is why I had explored PureScript.
    • skeeterbug 11y ago
      Update: The bug is with pulp server https://github.com/bodil/pulp/issues/133 https://github.com/bodil/pulp/issues/133
      • pka 11y ago
        Cool, does it work for you now?