3 ms·
Attractive, yes. But why, exactly, is this better than my browser's bookmarks?
by synnik 17y ago
Attractive, yes. But why, exactly, is this better than my browser's bookmarks?
- georgekv 17y agohttp://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/facebook_wants_to_be_your_one_true_login.php http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/facebook_wants_to_be_yo... Maybe this?
- jackowayed 17y agoHow is this related whatsoever?
- mortenjorck 17y agoThis could be better than your browser's bookmarks. While I appreciate the simplicity of it, it's too simple as it is now. The potential benefit here is in hierarchy, which bookmarks generally lack. How about this: 4 links at the big 128 x 128 size. The sites you check every session. 8 links at 64 x 64. The ones you use pretty frequently. 16 links at 32 x 32. And heck, maybe 32 at 16x16. I would use that.
- Groxx 17y agoIt's... shinier? Not to imply that's degrading it, lots of people have trouble handling the bookmarks menu, and this is much more graphically memorable / understandable, so it's likely they could get it more easily. The buttons are also bigger, which (though I'm HUGELY against large browser chrome) can be useful.