4 ms·

Why not? It works. Cops without guns: https://youtu.be/cX5CPx4RKWw https://youtu.be/cX5CPx4RKWw Cop with gun: https://youtu.be/RdoeBXt06Bc https://youtu.be/Rd

• merpnderp 11y ago
  Those cops were very brave, but you're going to be hard pressed to find even a tiny minority of Americans willing to put cop lives in that kind of danger.
  • jdietrich 11y ago
    The British approach is safer for both officers and the public. By emphasising containment and de-escalation, British officers avoid the kind of chaotic and unpredictable confrontations that lead to fatalities. Only one British police officer was killed in the line of duty last year - PC David Phillips, who was run over during a pursuit. In the same year, eight American officers were killed by vehicular assault, 36 were fatally shot, three died after being assaulted and two died of accidental gunshot wounds. In 2014, no British police officer was killed on duty. Even accounting for the difference in population and the prevalence of firearms, there is a substantial disparity. Britain does have armed criminals, but our police are not routinely armed. There were riots across Britain in 2011, precipitated in large part by the fatal shooting by police of Mark Duggan. Only one other person was shot by the police in 2011. In the same year, the FBI estimated that 400 Americans were killed by police officers, but no official count exists. There is considerable interest amongst US police forces in learning from the British approach, as shown in this documentary: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=66pr23xUKZc https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=66pr23xUKZc
    • mucker 11y ago
      And the police of Britain are so anaemic that they let _THOUSANDS_ of children be abused rather than risk confrontation. You are not selling me.
      • deleted 11y ago
        [deleted]