3 ms·
Thanks for the concrete description. Can I still use dynamic constructs such as string subscripts to associative arrays and code generation via eval()?
by Roboprog 11y ago
Thanks for the concrete description. Can I still use dynamic constructs such as string subscripts to associative arrays and code generation via eval()?
- nothrabannosir 11y agoYou mean in TS? Yes. ∀ x: I can do x in JS → I can do x in TS But, let's assume for a second that you couldn't: this thread is about TS being future-proof. I.e.: ∃ x: I can do x in TS & I cannot do x in JS? No, false. This implies TS = JS. And that's the point: semantically, TS = JS.
- Roboprog 11y agoOK, that's a good start. Is there a tool analogous to JSDoc for TypeScript that gathers the same docs without repeating the type info already in the code?
- elisee 11y agohttp://typedoc.io/ http://typedoc.io/ might be what you're looking for.
- Roboprog 11y agoThanks. Also, some informative samples of what TypeScript itself looks like. https://github.com/sebastian-lenz/typedoc/blob/master/src/lib/application.ts https://github.com/sebastian-lenz/typedoc/blob/master/src/li...