3 ms·

I argue with 'typable.' If I'm reading this from my smartphone and typing it on my computer (or vice versa), I'm going to lose my place. Maybe formatting could

by delinka 11y ago

I argue with 'typable.' If I'm reading this from my smartphone and typing it on my computer (or vice versa), I'm going to lose my place. Maybe formatting could fix that, but it's still a pretty long chunk of text to get lost in.

Gracana 11y ago
Two bytes at a time is not so bad, especially with some friendly newlines: 232e 2252 b8d5 a294 dd85 6402 0f0c f609 f511 b3d1 96ed 8303 0ce9 615c 6737 f578 Of course, it's still a lot of characters.
- jobigoud 11y ago
  In fact I find it MUCH more typable than my usual generated password, which are like ,X,=a&ny.Qz{?Uif@0q( and are a real pain to type on mobile due to the special characters.
  - ThrustVectoring 11y ago
    That might be ameliorated by choosing a touch keyboard optimized for character-by-character input rather than english text. MessagEase works well for me for that.