4 ms·
Interesting. I was checking various sites benchmarking VPNs and I remember them reporting IVPN speeds being around 3Mbps. Good to know that's not the case. Co
by newman314 11y ago
Interesting.
I was checking various sites benchmarking VPNs and I remember them reporting IVPN speeds being around 3Mbps. Good to know that's not the case.
Couple of things that are missing. I use IPSec/L2TP. Does not seem to have columns tracking these. I did a bunch of sorting and filtering and the following seem to be the only providers that check all the marks for no logging and good business practices.
* AzireVPN
* IVPN
* SecureVPN.to
* Trust.Zone
- mirimir 11y agoHow can you know whether providers are lying about not logging? How do you know whether their hosting and uplink providers are logging? One thing you can objectively determine is how long they've been in business. Use https://archive.org/web/ https://archive.org/web/ for that. Then filter for bad news. HMA giving up users to LEA. Anonymizer being owned by the CIA. Any VPN service that's been in business for at least five years, and has no bad news, is probably OK.
- newman314 11y agoI can't. I was just going off of what was presented on the spreadsheet. However based on my filtering, IVPN certainly seems worth checking out.
- dublinben 11y agoYou can learn something when different operators are involved in court cases and either provide, or are unable to provide certain information. Currently PrivateInternetAccess is risking contempt of court charges if they've lied about their logging policies, in their response to a federal subpoena.[0] [0]https://torrentfreak.com/vpn-providers-no-logging-claims-tested-in-fbi-case-160312/ https://torrentfreak.com/vpn-providers-no-logging-claims-tes...
- mirimir 11y agoThat's good news! PIA tends to get dumped on for being US-based and ultra-low-cost.