The seemingly "poor" intelligence represented from the article, ironically, really weakens what intelligence is. In certain sense, this article really strengthe

The seemingly "poor" intelligence represented from the article, ironically, really weakens what intelligence is. In certain sense, this article really strengthen the importance of AlphaGo: AlphaGo does appear know Go, and the author seemingly have weak understanding of AI and GO, making it a poor intelligent being that is specialized in writing articles. Apparently Go is considered require more intelligence than writing normal articles. So AlphaGo performs well in a task that requires more intelligence, and the author performs poorly in a task that requires less intelligence. Does this make AlphaGo a better intelligent being than the author?