2 ms·
The point I was making is that use of messaging in the first place implies an architectural style other than RPC. If you're going to use RPC, host a REST endpo
by slowmovintarget 11y ago
The point I was making is that use of messaging in the first place implies an architectural style other than RPC.
If you're going to use RPC, host a REST endpoint and cache the living daylights out of it.
- lobster_johnson 11y agoBut if you read what I wrote elsewhere in this thread, NATS is not a traditional messaging broker, and is highly suitable for RPC.