> What's the equivalence between a random black cat on a mirror and an intentionally operated drone? It's possible that the drone was exactly as not-dangerous

> What's the equivalence between a random black cat on a mirror and an intentionally operated drone? It's possible that the drone was exactly as not-dangerous as the black cat in that it was far away from the helicoptor and would have backed off if the helicoptor had moved towards it. It's also possible that the operator was incompetent (incapable of remaining far from the helicoptor) or maliciously trying to run it into the helicopter. But I'm not going to jump to that assumption on some guy's hunch -- which is what everyone else seems to be doing. > I don't see any need for drones to operate near forest fires, You almost certainly have hobbies that I don't see any need for. That wouldn't be justification for banning them.